It's time to "speak up" #6
So here we go again. Next performance by Dana. Her topic was "Body of the speech".
The next issue which is very important to discuss is the body of the speech. Now I'm going to observe and evaluate Dana's speech.
1. Introduction
- What technique(s) was used in the introduction?
At the very beginning Dana used rhetorical question as a attention-getter.
- Any link-element?
- Was the thesis statement given?
Yes, I think it's the thesis of Dana's speech: "The body of the speech is where you offer the evidence to support your main message. An effective public speaker will use this opportunity to deliver a powerful speech that will be memorable for the audience."
- How effective was the introduction?
Very effective Average Not effective Max 10 pts
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8
2. Body
- How well structured was the information presented?
Highly organized Some organization None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech?
Dana used outlining and presentation to support her speech and to make it more understandable.
- How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good Had some problems Had major problems
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of Some Almost no
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
Lots of Some None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Was it coherent?
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Max 10 pts - 8 pts
3. Conclusion
-What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?
Summarizing the speech, Dana showed again the importance of the body and the correct structure of it to the audience.
-Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?)
Almost steps were followed.
-How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective Some conclusion None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Total points: 25
Given points: 30
It's time to transfer ti the next speech. See you in the following post!
By CAMOMILE
The next issue which is very important to discuss is the body of the speech. Now I'm going to observe and evaluate Dana's speech.
1. Introduction
- What technique(s) was used in the introduction?
At the very beginning Dana used rhetorical question as a attention-getter.
- Any link-element?
After the rhetorical question Dana made a smooth transition to the thesis of her speech where she reasoned about the importance of the body.
Yes, I think it's the thesis of Dana's speech: "The body of the speech is where you offer the evidence to support your main message. An effective public speaker will use this opportunity to deliver a powerful speech that will be memorable for the audience."
- How effective was the introduction?
Very effective Average Not effective Max 10 pts
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8
2. Body
- How well structured was the information presented?
Highly organized Some organization None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech?
Dana used outlining and presentation to support her speech and to make it more understandable.
- How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good Had some problems Had major problems
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of Some Almost no
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
Lots of Some None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Was it coherent?
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Max 10 pts - 8 pts
3. Conclusion
-What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?
Summarizing the speech, Dana showed again the importance of the body and the correct structure of it to the audience.
-Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?)
Almost steps were followed.
-How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective Some conclusion None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Total points: 25
Given points: 30
It's time to transfer ti the next speech. See you in the following post!
By CAMOMILE
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий