Toastmasters 2017
Hey there! I'm here again after a week break. Nice to see you!
Our next
task was to evaluate three performances at Toastmasters 2017 with the help of a chart from the
student’s book. We were meant to listen to their performance and then select
our own winner.
So three
contestants that we need to evaluate are: Kevin Stamper, Simon Bucknall and
Manoj Vasudevan. I must say that I absolutely loved all the performances. These
people are awesome public speakers, I loved watching these videos so much
because it was a unique opportunity to learn something from them right on the
spot.
So first
performance that I watched was “Pull Less, Bend More” by Manoj Vasudevan.
№
|
|
Max points
|
Given points
|
I
|
Speech Content
|
45
|
40
|
|
Organization (comment on
effectiveness of introduction; clarity of body, including both major
divisions and support points; and efficacy of conclusion)
|
20
|
16
|
|
Support (comment on speaker's use of facts, stories, illustrations,
examples and/or logic to expand, explain, defend, inform the audience)
|
15
|
15
|
|
Cohesion (comment on the speaker's ability to unify the speech and keep
clear focus through use of transitions, summaries, and other unifying
elements)
|
10
|
9
|
II
|
Speech Delivery
|
40
|
30
|
|
Vocal presentation
|
20
|
15
|
|
1) volume
|
|
|
|
2) tempo
|
|
|
|
3) pitch
|
|
|
|
4) emphasis
|
|
|
|
5) clear articulation
|
|
|
|
Physical presentation
|
20
|
15
|
|
1) eye contact
|
|
|
|
2) gesturing
|
|
|
|
3) posture
|
|
|
|
4) facial expression
|
|
|
|
5) movement
|
|
|
|
6) dress
|
|
|
III
|
General Effectiveness
|
15
|
15
|
|
Amount of time used (8
mins)
|
|
|
|
Adherence to time
requirements (comment on whether or
not the speaker made good use of time, including whether the speech was too
short or too long)
|
5
|
5
|
|
Creativity (comment on art/uniqueness/individualized nature of the speech)
|
10
|
10
|
|
TOTAL POINTS:
|
100
|
85
|
The second performance that I’ve watched was “What
James Bullock Taught Me” by Simon Bucknall.
№
|
|
Max points
|
Given points
|
I
|
Speech Content
|
45
|
40
|
|
Organization (comment on
effectiveness of introduction; clarity of body, including both major
divisions and support points; and efficacy of conclusion)
|
20
|
20
|
|
Support (comment on speaker's use of facts, stories, illustrations,
examples and/or logic to expand, explain, defend, inform the audience)
|
15
|
15
|
|
Cohesion (comment on the speaker's ability to unify the speech and keep
clear focus through use of transitions, summaries, and other unifying
elements)
|
10
|
5
|
II
|
Speech Delivery
|
40
|
37
|
|
Vocal presentation
|
20
|
17
|
|
1) volume
|
|
|
|
2) tempo
|
|
|
|
3) pitch
|
|
|
|
4) emphasis
|
|
|
|
5) clear articulation
|
|
|
|
Physical presentation
|
20
|
20
|
|
1) eye contact
|
|
|
|
2) gesturing
|
|
|
|
3) posture
|
|
|
|
4) facial expression
|
|
|
|
5) movement
|
|
|
|
6) dress
|
|
|
III
|
General Effectiveness
|
15
|
9
|
|
Amount of time used (8
mins)
|
|
|
|
Adherence to time
requirements (comment on whether or
not the speaker made good use of time, including whether the speech was too
short or too long)
|
5
|
4
|
|
Creativity (comment on art/uniqueness/individualized nature of the speech)
|
10
|
5
|
|
TOTAL POINTS:
|
100
|
86
|
And the last performance that I needed to watch
and analyze was “Speak Up” by Kevin Stamper.
№
|
|
Max points
|
Given points
|
I
|
Speech Content
|
45
|
45
|
|
Organization (comment on
effectiveness of introduction; clarity of body, including both major
divisions and support points; and efficacy of conclusion)
|
20
|
20
|
|
Support (comment on speaker's use of facts, stories, illustrations,
examples and/or logic to expand, explain, defend, inform the audience)
|
15
|
15
|
|
Cohesion (comment on the speaker's ability to unify the speech and keep
clear focus through use of transitions, summaries, and other unifying
elements)
|
10
|
10
|
II
|
Speech Delivery
|
40
|
40
|
|
Vocal presentation
|
20
|
20
|
|
1) volume
|
|
|
|
2) tempo
|
|
|
|
3) pitch
|
|
|
|
4) emphasis
|
|
|
|
5) clear articulation
|
|
|
|
Physical presentation
|
20
|
20
|
|
1) eye contact
|
|
|
|
2) gesturing
|
|
|
|
3) posture
|
|
|
|
4) facial expression
|
|
|
|
5) movement
|
|
|
|
6) dress
|
|
|
III
|
General Effectiveness
|
15
|
14
|
|
Amount of time used (8
mins)
|
|
|
|
Adherence to time
requirements (comment on whether or
not the speaker made good use of time, including whether the speech was too
short or too long)
|
5
|
5
|
|
Creativity (comment on art/uniqueness/individualized nature of the speech)
|
10
|
9
|
|
TOTAL POINTS:
|
100
|
99
|
And I want to analyze his performance in
details, because I liked this performance the most.
He started his performance very unusual. He
interacted with the audience right away. He asked the audience to count to
three with him. I liked his performance a lot, because it was very touching and
sometimes I wanted to cry, because Kevin’s stories were amazing.
The
organization of his speech was just perfect. The introduction was
effective, it was very funny and smart; he interacted with the audience, as I
said earlier, and made people laugh right away. His introduction was perfect also
because there were a lot of things that made me think about my voice and how
unique my voice was. Kevin’s message was understandable, clearly explained and
well-structured. I would not add anything to his performance. I even smiled
through tears when he was talking about his daughter and how she started to
talk.
The
support of his speech was great as well. He used a lot of stories from
his life, about his daughter, about his nun, a therapist, etc. Everything was
well-described and I felt like I knew all of these people. Kevin’s voice is
very calm and beautiful I liked the performance not only because he is a great
public speaker but also because of his voice. A unique one.
Cohesion. He managed to make perfect transitions from one
part to another and he was able to unify all the facts and stories together. From
a story about a nun to a story about his child. He carried his message till the
very end and everything Kevin was saying was to the point of his presentation. He
didn’t ‘fall out’ from the message and was talking to us that it is important
to finally find our voices and speak up. To be honest, I thought that a perfect
soundtrack for his performance is a song by our Russian singer Polina Gagarina
– ‘Million Voices’. His performance reminded me of this song.
I
loved his vocal presentation. Kevin’s voice is beautiful and it was a
pleasure to listen to him. He had clear articulation, perfect volume and I
liked the way he pronounced the words. He made a lot of jokes and was playing
with the pitch of his voice and I liked that, too. He also was whispering
sometimes and it added some magic to his performance. I liked how calm and
strong at the same time his voice was.
As
for his Physical presentation he made eye contact with
the audience, interacted with the audience, his face expressions were just perfect
and I didn’t want him to end his presentation. I wanted to watch the video
non-stop. He also used a lot of gestures especially when he was describing his
daughter. And was dressed in a nice suit.
He was
speaking for about seven and a half minutes and I did not think it was too
long, because he delivered the message to everyone and I think that he touched
everyone’s heart with this performance. I didn’t think that it was too long or
too short, everything was on time. But I wanted to hear some more actually (and
I mentioned it earlier). Kevin’s speech was creative and very unique (as his
voice, too) so I liked this speech the most.
What do you think of these performances? Did you
enjoyed them? Whom did you like the most? Tell me in the comment section.
By CAMOMILE
Hello, Dasha!
ОтветитьУдалитьIt is a pleasure to be able to read your new post!
I see why you liked Kevin's performance the most! He is a great speaker and it's a pleasure to listen to him. And yes, his voice is so beautiful!
Thank you for sharing your opinion!
Looking forward to your next post ^^
Dasha, I liked Kevin's speech too! He deserved to win! I recomend you to watch Toastmasters 2018, there is a lot of interesting perfomances.
ОтветитьУдалитьI liked Simon's performance in this competition the best, but Kevin also held up well. Thank you for your interesting assessment of his speech!
ОтветитьУдалить