It's time to "speak up" #4

Hi, my readers! Here is the evaluation of the second speaker. Natasha? my groupmate, gave a speech in ZOOM and her topic is "Creative thinking techniques". Let's see how I find her performance.



1. Introduction

What technique(s) was used in the introduction? 
In the introduction Natasha explained what she was going to speak about. I think she didn't use special techniques to get attention of the audience. But I liked her motivative reasonings.

Any link-element? 
Natasha presented her topic with the very beginning, after it she said: "Many people say: “I’m not a creative or a genious”. An interesting fact is that anyone can have great ideas." I think it's kind of link-element here.

Was the thesis statement given? 
I consider as a thesis statement this phrase: "Today we will speak about HOW to create new product. In fact, there are a lot of ways or methods of creativity development."

How effective was the introduction? 
Very effective          Average          Not effective         Max 10 pts
10  9  8                    7  6  5               4  3  2  1                      8

2. Body

How well structured was the information presented? 
Highly organized            Some organization        None
  10      9       8                       7    6   5    4             3  2  1

What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech? 
Natasha clearly distinguished all three methods, using introductory words, and made the transition between them smoother.

How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good           Had some problems         Had major problems
10   9   8                  7   6   5   4                          3   2   1

Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of                Some                  Almost no
10     8           7   6   5                 4   3   2   1

Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
Lots of               Some                  None
10   9   8           7   6   5              4   3   2   1

Was it coherent?
10     9    8   7    6   5   4   3    2   1

Max 10 pts      -      9 pts


3. Conclusion

-What technique(s) was used in the conclusion? 
I can't see any special techniques in the conclusion. But Natasha encouraged her listeners to believe that everyone is unique and creative.

-Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?) 
Almost all steps were followed. 

-How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective         Some conclusion        None
10   9   8                     7   6   5   4             3   2   1

Total points: 26 
Given points: 30


That's all with my evaluations. See you soon!

By CAMOMILE

Комментарии

Популярные сообщения