It's time to "speak up" #4
Hi, my readers! Here is the evaluation of the second speaker. Natasha? my groupmate, gave a speech in ZOOM and her topic is "Creative thinking techniques". Let's see how I find her performance.
1. Introduction
- What technique(s) was used in the introduction?
In the introduction Natasha explained what she was going to speak about. I think she didn't use special techniques to get attention of the audience. But I liked her motivative reasonings.
- Any link-element?
- Was the thesis statement given?
I consider as a thesis statement this phrase: "Today we will speak about HOW to create new product. In fact, there are a lot of ways or methods of creativity development."
- How effective was the introduction?
Very effective Average Not effective Max 10 pts
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8
2. Body
- How well structured was the information presented?
Highly organized Some organization None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech?
Natasha clearly distinguished all three methods, using introductory words, and made the transition between them smoother.
- How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good Had some problems Had major problems
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of Some Almost no
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
Lots of Some None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Was it coherent?
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Max 10 pts - 9 pts
3. Conclusion
-What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?
I can't see any special techniques in the conclusion. But Natasha encouraged her listeners to believe that everyone is unique and creative.
-Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?)
Almost all steps were followed.
-How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective Some conclusion None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Total points: 26
Given points: 30
That's all with my evaluations. See you soon!
By CAMOMILE
1. Introduction
- What technique(s) was used in the introduction?
In the introduction Natasha explained what she was going to speak about. I think she didn't use special techniques to get attention of the audience. But I liked her motivative reasonings.
- Any link-element?
Natasha presented her topic with the very beginning, after it she said: "Many people say: “I’m not a creative or a genious”. An interesting fact is that anyone can have great ideas." I think it's kind of link-element here.
I consider as a thesis statement this phrase: "Today we will speak about HOW to create new product. In fact, there are a lot of ways or methods of creativity development."
- How effective was the introduction?
Very effective Average Not effective Max 10 pts
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8
2. Body
- How well structured was the information presented?
Highly organized Some organization None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech?
Natasha clearly distinguished all three methods, using introductory words, and made the transition between them smoother.
- How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?
Very good Had some problems Had major problems
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)
Lots of Some Almost no
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
Lots of Some None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
- Was it coherent?
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Max 10 pts - 9 pts
3. Conclusion
-What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?
I can't see any special techniques in the conclusion. But Natasha encouraged her listeners to believe that everyone is unique and creative.
-Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?)
Almost all steps were followed.
-How effective was the conclusion?
Very effective Some conclusion None
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Total points: 26
Given points: 30
That's all with my evaluations. See you soon!
By CAMOMILE
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий